يعرض 1 - 2 نتائج من 2 نتيجة بحث عن '"Tax revenue"', وقت الاستعلام: 0.64s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 1
    دورية أكاديمية

    المؤلفون: Kutasi, Gábor, Marton, Ádám

    المصدر: Revista Finanzas y Política Económica; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2024); 121-143 ; Revista Finanzas y Política Económica; Vol. 16 Núm. 1 (2024); 121-143 ; Revista Finanzas y Política Económica; v. 16 n. 1 (2024); 121-143 ; 2011-7663 ; 2248-6046

    الوصف: The tax multiplier in macroeconomics assumes a negative relationship between the volume of tax revenue in a country and its GDP. However, it may also be relevant to GDP growth whether the same volume of tax burden is levied in a different structure. Can the fiscal government stimulate the GDP growth by restructuring the tax revenues? The following study analyses the linkage between GDP growth rate and the structure of tax revenues. A database contains data from 25 EU countries which are open economies in the European single market. The period starts in 1996 and lasts until 2018. The Eurostat classification is used for tax types. Dynamic GMM tests are applied for GDP equations based on expenditure and output approach and extended with taxation category determinants. The conclusions are that tax structure based on consumer taxes on production and income tax can support the economic growth, meanwhile higher weight of social contribution is a destructive factor for income expansion. The policy recommendation is to reweight the tax structure toward indirect taxes from direct taxes if economic growth is a preference in the tax system in a trade-oriented open economy. Novelty of the research: Application of Arellano-Bond version of Dynamic GMM test, comparable results for Solow-Swan and augmented Cobb-Douglas approaches, the composition of database, the falsification and verification of statements of the existing literature. ; El multiplicador de impuestos en macroeconomía supone una relación negativa entre el volumen de ingresos tributarios de un país y su PIB. Sin embargo, también puede ser relevante para el crecimiento del PIB si el mismo volumen de carga tributaria se recauda en una estructura diferente. ¿Puede el gobierno fiscal estimular el crecimiento del PIB reestructurando los ingresos tributarios? El presente estudio analiza el vínculo entre la tasa de crecimiento del PIB y la estructura de los ingresos tributarios. Una base de datos contiene datos de 25 países de la UE que son economías abiertas en el ...

    وصف الملف: application/pdf

    العلاقة: https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/5043/4976Test; Acosta-Ormaechea, S., & Morozumi, A. (2021). The value-added tax and growth: design matters. International Tax Public Finance, 28, 1211-1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-021-09681-2Test; Ahmad, S., & Sial, M. (2016). Taxes and economic growth: An empirical analysis of Pakistan. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 5(1)16-29. https://doi.org/10.21859/eulawrev-08062Test; Alfò, M., Carbonari, L., & Trovato, G. (2023). On the effects of taxation on growth: An empirical assessment. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 27(5), 1289-1318. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100522000219Test; Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968Test; Arnold, J. (2008). Do Tax Structures Affect Aggregate Economic Growth?: Empirical Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries. OECD Working Papers, 643. https://doi.org/10.1787/236001777843Test; Arnold, J., Bassanini, A., & Scarpetta, S. (2007). Solow or Lucas?: Testing Growth Models Using Panel Data from OECD Countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 592. https://doi.org/10.1787/028487061153Test; Bania, N., Gray, J., & Stone, J. (2007). Growth, taxes and government expenditures: Growth hills for U.S. states. National Tax Journal, 60(2), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2007.2.02Test; Barrios, S., & Schaechter, A., (2008). The quality of public finances and economic growth. European Economy, Economic Papers, 337. https://doi.org/10.2765/88752Test; Barro, R.J. (1990). Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogeneous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 103-105. https://doi.org/10.1086/261726Test; Cassette, A., & Paty, S. (2008). Tax competition among Eastern and Western European countries: With whom do countries compete? Economic Systems, 32(4), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2008.06.003Test; Elekes A., & Halmai, P. (2019). How to overcome the crisis of the European growth potential? The role of the government. European Journal of Comparative Economics, 16(2), 313-334. https://doi.org/10.25428/1824-2979/201902-313-334Test; Elshani, A., & Ahmeti, S. (2017). The Effect of Progressive Tax on Economic Growth Empirical Evidence from European OECD Countries. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4) 18-25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323342221_The_Effect_of_Progressive_Tax_on_Economic_Growth_Empirical_Evidence_from_European_OECD_CountriesTest; Engen, E., & Skinner, J. (1996). Taxation and economic growth. National Tax Journal, 49(4), 617-642. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41789231Test; Fidrmuc, J., & Degler, M. (2019). Temporal and Spatial Dependence of Interregional Risk Sharing: Evidence from Russia. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 25(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100518000706Test; Gale, W., Krupkin, A., & Rueben, K. (2015). The Relationship between Taxes and Growth: New Evidence. National Tax Journal, 68(4), 919-942. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.4.02Test; Gechert, S., & Heimberger, P. (2022). Do corporate tax cuts boost economic growth? European Economic Review, 147, 104157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104157Test; Gunter, S., Riera-Crichton, D., Vegh, V., & Vuletin, G. (2019). Non-Linear Effects of Tax Changes on Output: The Role of the Initial Level of Taxation. NBER Working Paper, 26570. http://www.nber.org/papers/w26570Test; Kalaš, B., Mirović, V., & Andrašić, J. (2017). Estimating the Impact of Taxes on the Economic Growth in the United States. Economic Themes, 55(4), 481-499. https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2017-0027Test; Kalaš, B., Mirović, V., & Milenkovic, N.B. (2018). The relationship between taxes and economic growth: Evidence from Serbia and Croatia. The European Journal of Applied Economics, 15(2), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.5937/EJAE15-18056Test; Kneller, R., Bleaney, M. F., & Gemmell, N. (1999). Fiscal policy and growth: evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 74(2), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727Test(99)00022-5; Kutasi, G., & Marton, Á. (2020). The long-term impact of public expenditures on GDP-growth. Society and Economy, 42(4), 403-419. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2020.00018Test; Lee, Y., & Gordon, R. (2005). Tax Structure and Economic Growth. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5-6), 1027-1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.07.002Test; Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & Chu, C.-S. J. (2002). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076Test(01)00098-7; Ljungqvist, A., & Smolyansky, M. (2018). To Cut or Not to Cut? On The Impact of Corporate Taxes on Employment and Income. NBER Working Paper 20753. https://www.nber.org/papers/w20753Test; Macek, R. (2014). The Impact of Taxation on Economic Growth: Case Study of OECD Countries. Review of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0002Test; McNabb, K. (2018). Tax Structures and Economic Growth: New Evidence from the Government Revenue Dataset. Journal of International Development, 30(2), 173-205. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3345Test; Mertens, K., & Olea, J.L.M. (2018). Marginal Tax Rates and Income: New Time Series Evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(4) 1803-1884. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjy008Test; Myles, G. (2000). Taxation and Economic Growth. Fiscal Studies, 21(1) 141-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00583.xTest; Rhee, T, (2012). Macroeconomic Effects of Progressive Taxation, https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2013/retrieve.php?pdfid=394Test; Stoilova, D. (2017). Tax structure and economic growth: Evidence from the European Union. Contaduría y Administración, 62(3), 1041-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2017.04.006Test; Widmalm, F. (2001) Tax Structure and Growth: Are Some Taxes Better Than Others? Public Choice, 107(3-4), 199-219. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010340017288Test; Zidar, O. (2019). Tax Cuts for Whom? Heterogenous Effects of Income Tax Changes on Growth and Employment. Journal of Political Economy, 127(3), 1437-1472. https://doi.org/10.1086/701424Test; https://revfinypolecon.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/5043Test

  2. 2
    دورية أكاديمية

    المصدر: Revista Finanzas y Política Económica; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2017); 135-149 ; Revista Finanzas y Política Económica; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2017); 135-149 ; Revista Finanzas y Política Económica; v. 9 n. 1 (2017); 135-149 ; 2011-7663 ; 2248-6046 ; 10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v9.n1.2017

    الوصف: This paper analyses the Spanish tax administration, evaluating the relative efficiency of each of the regional offices that are its constituent parts via output-oriented two-stage data envelopment analysis. In the study, a total of 47 regional offices were analysed, considering three inputs: 1) current expenditure in goods and services; 2) number of tax returns processed in terms of the two main direct taxes; and, 3) personnel numbers. Revenue resulting from tax assessments was considered as output. The analysis shows that the efficient action of regional offices might have increased by 21.6% the results of the management of this administration. ; A través de este trabajo se ha abordado el análisis de la administración tributaria española mediante la evaluación de la eficiencia relativa de cada una de las oficinas territoriales que la integran, empleando para ello el análisis envolvente de datos de forma bietápica, con una orientación output. En el estudio se han analizado 47 oficinas territoriales, considerando tres inputs: 1) los gastos corrientes en bienes y servicios; 2) el número de declaraciones gestionadas por los dos principales impuestos directos; y 3) el número de efectivos que presta sus servicios. Como output los Ingresos por Actos de Liquidación. El análisis pone de manifiesto que una actuación eficiente de las oficinas territoriales podría haber incrementado un 21.6% los resultados de la gestión de esta Administración. ; Neste trabalho, aborda-se a análise da administração tributária espanhola mediante a avaliação da eficiência relativa de cada um dos escritórios territoriais que a integram, empregando, para isso, a análise envolvente de dados de forma bietápica, com uma orientação output. Neste estudo, analisaram-se 47 escritórios territoriais considerando três inputs: 1) os gastos correntes em bens e serviços; 2) o número de declarações gerenciadas pelos dois principais impostos diretos e 3) o número de efetivos que presta seus serviços. Como output, os Ingressos por Atos de Liquidação. A análise ...

    وصف الملف: application/pdf; text/html; application/xml