دورية أكاديمية
How do argumentation diagrams compare when student pairs use them as a means for debate or as a tool for representing debate?
| العنوان: | How do argumentation diagrams compare when student pairs use them as a means for debate or as a tool for representing debate? |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Lund, Kristine, Baker, Michael, Molinari, Gaëlle, Séjourné, Arnauld |
| المساهمون: | Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations (ICAR), École normale supérieure de Lyon (ENS de Lyon)-Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (UL2)-INRP-Ecole Normale Supérieure Lettres et Sciences Humaines (ENS LSH)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) |
| المصدر: | International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning ; https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00373415Test ; International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 2007, 2, pp.273-295. ⟨10.1007/s11412-007-9019-z⟩ |
| بيانات النشر: | HAL CCSD |
| سنة النشر: | 2007 |
| المجموعة: | Portail HAL de l'Université Lumière Lyon 2 |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | Argumentation diagram, Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), socio-cognitive conflict, multiple external representations, pedagogical debate, [SHS.EDU]Humanities and Social Sciences/Education, [SHS.LANGUE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics, [SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology |
| الوصف: | International audience ; The objective of the research presented here was to study the influence of two types of instruction for using an argumentation diagram during pedagogical debates over the Internet. In particular, we studied how using an argumentation diagram as a medium of debate (“Graph for debating”) compared to using an argumentation diagram as a way of representing a debate (“Graph for representing chat debate”). Two groups of students produced an individual argument diagram, then debated in pairs in one of the two conditions, and finally revised their individual diagrams in light of their debate. We developed an original analysis method (ADAM) in order to evaluate the differences between the argumentation diagrams constructed collaboratively, during the interactions that constituted the experimental conditions, as well as individually before and after debate in the two experimental conditions. The results suggest a complimentary relationship between the two types of argumentation diagram usage in the framework of conceptual learning centered on issues of debate important for society. More specifically and firstly, students who were instructed to use the argumentation diagram to represent their debate (“Graph for representing chat debate”) were less inclined to take position in relation to the same graphical element while collaborating. On the other hand, students who were instructed to use the argumentation diagram alongside a chat (“Graph for debating”) expressed more personal opinions while collaborating. Secondly, the instructions given to the participants regarding the use of the argumentation diagram during the collaborative phase (either for debate or for representing a chat debate) have a significant impact on the post-individual graphs. In the individual graphs revised after the collaborative phase, participants in the condition “graph for representing chat debate” added more examples, consequences and causes. It follows that a specific usage for an argumentation diagram can be chosen and ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
| اللغة: | English |
| العلاقة: | halshs-00373415; https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00373415Test |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11412-007-9019-z |
| الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9019-zTest https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00373415Test |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.A10FC5 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11412-007-9019-z |
|---|