دورية أكاديمية
Adolescent SBIRT in Pediatric Primary Care: Patient Outcomes From a Randomized Trial in an Integrated Health Care System
| العنوان: | Adolescent SBIRT in Pediatric Primary Care: Patient Outcomes From a Randomized Trial in an Integrated Health Care System |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Sterling, Stacy, Kline-Simon, Andrea, Jones, Ashley, Wong, Anna, Satre, Derek, Weisner, Constance |
| المصدر: | Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews |
| بيانات النشر: | Advocate Aurora Health Institutional Repository |
| سنة النشر: | 2017 |
| المجموعة: | Aurora Health Care Digital Repository |
| مصطلحات موضوعية: | child and adolescent health, behavioral and mental health, substance abuse, addiction, Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms, Pediatrics, Primary Care, Psychiatric and Mental Health, Substance Abuse and Addiction |
| الوصف: | Background: Many adolescents in need of specialty treatment for substance use and mental health problems never access care. Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) is a promising approach to early identification and intervention for adolescent substance use. We describe patient outcomes from a trial of different modalities of SBIRT for adolescents in primary care. Methods: We randomized pediatricians (N = 52) in a pediatrics clinic to three study arms: 1) pediatrician-only, in which pediatricians were trained to deliver SBIRT; 2) embedded behavioral health clinician (BHC), in which pediatricians referred adolescents who endorsed risk factors (substance use or mood symptoms) to a BHC; and 3) usual care (UC). We used electronic health record (EHR) data to examine risk factors, CRAFFT scores, treatment referral, initiation and engagement. Results: 1,871 patients were eligible for assessments, brief interventions and referrals. Differences in outcomes between the index and the next well visit within 2 years were examined across the three arms. The odds of risk factor endorsement decreased over time for all patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05–0.11); the embedded-BHC arm had significantly lower odds of risk factor endorsement compared to UC (aOR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43–0.97); there were no differences between UC and the physician-only arm. There were no differences in CRAFFT scores over time or between intervention arms. The embedded-BHC arm had fewer referrals to specialty treatment compared to the other study arms; referral rates between the physician-only and UC arms did not differ. Among those referred, the physician-only arm had significantly lower odds of treatment initiation compared with UC (aOR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.28–0.99) and the embedded-BHC arm (aOR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.12–0.49); no differences were found between UC and embedded-BHC. There were no differences in treatment engagement (at least 2 visits within 30 days) across the arms. Conclusion: ... |
| نوع الوثيقة: | text |
| اللغة: | unknown |
| العلاقة: | https://institutionalrepository.aah.org/jpcrr/vol4/iss3/107Test |
| DOI: | 10.17294/2330-0698.1558 |
| الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1558Test https://institutionalrepository.aah.org/jpcrr/vol4/iss3/107Test |
| رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.CAEE0779 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
| DOI: | 10.17294/2330-0698.1558 |
|---|