دورية أكاديمية

The Correlative Strength of Objective Physical Assessment Against the ECOG Performance Status Assessment in Individuals Diagnosed With Cancer.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The Correlative Strength of Objective Physical Assessment Against the ECOG Performance Status Assessment in Individuals Diagnosed With Cancer.
المؤلفون: Quinn, Sarah E, Crandell, Catherine E, Blake, Morgan E, Bontrager, Amy M, Dempsey, Alexandra G, Lewis, Derek J, Hamm, John T, Flynn, Joseph M, Smith, Grant S, Wingard, Christopher J
المصدر: Physical Therapy; Mar2020, Vol. 100 Issue 3, p416-428, 13p
مصطلحات موضوعية: CANCER patients, CANCER treatment, STATISTICAL correlation, EXERCISE tests, EXPERIMENTAL design, HEALTH status indicators, LONGITUDINAL method, NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL tests, RESEARCH methodology, QUALITY of life, REGRESSION analysis, STATISTICS, TUMORS, DATA analysis, SPECIALTY hospitals, BODY movement, PHYSICAL activity, DATA analysis software, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, FUNCTIONAL assessment, DISEASE complications
مصطلحات جغرافية: KENTUCKY
مستخلص: Background Individuals with cancer experience loss of function and disability due to disease and cancer-related treatments. Physical fitness and frailty influence treatment plans and may predict cancer outcomes. Outcome measures currently used may not provide sufficiently comprehensive assessment of physical performance. Objective The objectives of this study are to: (1) describe the development of a functional measure, the Bellarmine Norton Assessment Tool (BNAT), for individuals with cancer; and (2) assess the relationship between the BNAT and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status, a commonly used classification system by oncologists. Design This was a prospective cohort correlation study. Methods The BNAT encompasses 1 self-reported physical activity question and 4 objective tests: 2-Minute Step Test, 30-Second Sit to Stand, Timed Arm Curl, and Timed Up and Go. The BNAT score and its components were compared with ECOG Performance Status scores assigned by oncologists and analyzed for correlation and agreement. Results A total of 103 male and female individuals (ages 33–87 years) with various cancer diagnoses participated. The mean (SD) ECOG Performance Status score was 0.95 (0.87), range 0 to 3, and the mean BNAT score was 14.9 (4.3), range 5 to 24. Spearman agreement association of BNAT and ECOG Performance Status scores revealed a significant moderate negative relationship (r  = −0.568). Limitations The BNAT was compared with the ECOG Performance Status, a commonly used but subjective measure. Additionally, a common data set was used for both deriving and evaluating the BNAT performance scale. Conclusions There was a moderate negative linear relationship of BNAT to ECOG Performance Status scores across all participants. Utilization of the BNAT may reflect overall physical performance and provide comprehensive and meaningful detail to influence therapeutic decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Physical Therapy is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
قاعدة البيانات: Complementary Index
الوصف
تدمد:00319023
DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzz192