دورية أكاديمية

Surface Conductance of Five Different Crops Based on 10 Years of Eddy-Covariance Measurements

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Surface Conductance of Five Different Crops Based on 10 Years of Eddy-Covariance Measurements
المؤلفون: Uwe Spank, Barbara Köstner, Uta Moderow, Thomas Grünwald, Christian Bernhofer
المصدر: Meteorologische Zeitschrift, Vol 25, Iss 3, Pp 251-266 (2016)
بيانات النشر: Borntraeger, 2016.
سنة النشر: 2016
المجموعة: LCC:Meteorology. Climatology
مصطلحات موضوعية: big leaf model, canopy conductance, canopy resistance, energy balance closure, error analysis, evapotranspiration, hydrological modelling, light use efficiency, Penman-Monteith approach, site water budget, soil evaporation, transpiration, uncertainty assessment, Meteorology. Climatology, QC851-999
الوصف: The Penman-Monteith (PM) equation is a state-of-the-art modelling approach to simulate evapotranspiration (ET) at site and local scale. However, its practical application is often restricted by the availability and quality of required parameters. One of these parameters is the canopy conductance. Long term measurements of evapotranspiration by the eddy-covariance method provide an improved data basis to determine this parameter by inverse modelling. Because this approach may also include evaporation from the soil, not only the ‘actual’ canopy conductance but the whole surface conductance (gc$g_{c}$) is addressed. Two full cycles of crop rotation with five different crop types (winter barley, winter rape seed, winter wheat, silage maize, and spring barley) have been continuously monitored for 10 years. These data form the basis for this study. As estimates of gc$g_{c}$ are obtained on basis of measurements, we investigated the impact of measurements uncertainties on obtained values of gc$g_{c }$. Here, two different foci were inspected more in detail. Firstly, the effect of the energy balance closure gap (EBCG) on obtained values of gc$g_{c}$ was analysed. Secondly, the common hydrological practice to use vegetation height (hc$h_{c}$) to determine the period of highest plant activity (i.e., times with maximum gc$g_{c}$ concerning CO2-exchange and transpiration) was critically reviewed. The results showed that hc$h_{c}$ and gc$g_{c}$ do only agree at the beginning of the growing season but increasingly differ during the rest of the growing season. Thus, the utilisation of hc$h_{c}$ as a proxy to assess maximum gc$g_{c}$ (gc,max$g_{c,\text{max}}$) can lead to inaccurate estimates of gc,max$g_{c,\text{max}}$ which in turn can cause serious shortcomings in simulated ET. The light use efficiency (LUE) is superior to hc$h_{c}$ as a proxy to determine periods with maximum gc$g_{c}$. Based on this proxy, crop specific estimates of gc,max$g_{c,\text{max}}$ could be determined for the first (and the second) cycle of crop rotation: winter barley, 19.2 mm s−1 (16.0 mm s−1); winter rape seed, 12.3 mm s−1 (13.1 mm s−1); winter wheat, 16.5 mm s−1 (11.2 mm s−1); silage maize, 7.4 mm s−1 (8.5 mm s−1); and spring barley, 7.0 mm s−1 (6.2 mm s−1).
نوع الوثيقة: article
وصف الملف: electronic resource
اللغة: English
تدمد: 0941-2948
العلاقة: https://doaj.org/toc/0941-2948Test
DOI: 10.1127/metz/2016/0732
الوصول الحر: https://doaj.org/article/3c160ecf21b145b5a4608ddd8b6a3b2dTest
رقم الانضمام: edsdoj.3c160ecf21b145b5a4608ddd8b6a3b2d
قاعدة البيانات: Directory of Open Access Journals
الوصف
تدمد:09412948
DOI:10.1127/metz/2016/0732