Clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Clinical utility and reproducibility of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
المؤلفون: Timothy Lathlean, Akhilesh Kumar Ramachandran, Stephanie Sim, Ian R Whittle
المصدر: BMJ open. 12(5)
سنة النشر: 2022
مصطلحات موضوعية: Review Literature as Topic, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Electromyography, Research Design, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, General Medicine, Low Back Pain, Systematic Reviews as Topic
الوصف: IntroductionChronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most common disorders presenting in primary healthcare. Kinematic studies of low lumbar pelvic mobility allied with surface electromyography (sEMG) may assist in the assessment and management of CLBP. However, the applicability in the use of sEMG in the clinical setting remains uncertain. In this protocol, we aim to review the clinical utility and reproducibility of the sEMG component of these kinematic studies in patients with CLBP.Methods and analysisThis protocol was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and results will be reported in line with the PRISMA. Searches will be conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL and Google Scholar databases, along with a comprehensive review of grey literature. Two reviewers will conduct the searches and independently screen them, according to title and abstract. Two independent reviewers will then assess the full-text versions of those selected articles and assess the risk of bias using the defined protocol inclusion criteria. The risk of bias within the studies included will be assessed via the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, V.2 and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines will be used to assess certainty of evidence for recommendations based on the risk of bias findings. Meta-analysis will be conducted where appropriate on groups of studies with low heterogeneity. In instances of higher heterogeneity, meta-synthesis will instead be completed, comparing results in terms of increased or decreased clinical utility and/or reproducibility of sEMG.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was not required for this research. It is anticipated that the results will influence the use, interpretation and further development of sEMG in management and assessment of these patients.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021273936.
تدمد: 2044-6055
الوصول الحر: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::245f043649b1fe05bb0d278ee929c10aTest
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35577472Test
حقوق: OPEN
رقم الانضمام: edsair.doi.dedup.....245f043649b1fe05bb0d278ee929c10a
قاعدة البيانات: OpenAIRE