دورية أكاديمية
Multiple screw fixation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femur neck fracture using a nationwide hip fracture registry
العنوان: | Multiple screw fixation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femur neck fracture using a nationwide hip fracture registry |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Jin-Woo Kim, Kyung-Soon Park, Young-Kyun Lee, Ji Wan Kim, Yong-Chan Ha, Seung-Hoon Baek |
المصدر: | Scientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) |
بيانات النشر: | Nature Portfolio |
سنة النشر: | 2021 |
المجموعة: | Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
مصطلحات موضوعية: | Medicine, Science |
الوصف: | Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) recently gained popularity as a treatment for femur neck fracture (FNF), but there have been few studies comparing this with multiple screw fixation (MSF) in the elderly population. The purpose of this study is to compare (1) surgery-related parameters, (2) reoperation rate as a local complication, (3) in-hospital systemic complication rate, and (4) mortality rate at 1 year after MSF and cementless BHA in patients with FNF using nationwide data. Six-hundred sixty-six hips (aged ≥ 50 years) extracted from nationwide Hip Fracture Registry were included in this study (133 MSF and 533 cementless BHA). One hundred fifty-six hips were divided into nondisplaced FNF (Group A) and 510 into displaced FNF (Group B). We evaluated (1) surgery-related parameters (anesthesia type, time to surgery, operation time, estimated blood loss and volume of postoperative transfusion), (2) the rate of and reasons for reoperation, (3) the rate and type of in-hospital systemic complications and (4) one-year mortality rate after surgery. In Group A, MSF showed shorter operation time (p = 0.004) and lower incidence of in-hospital systemic complications (p = 0.003). In Group B, cementless BHA demonstrated lower reoperation rate than MSF (p < 0.001). In both Group A and B, cementless BHA was associated with higher estimated blood loss than MSF (p < 0.001). Based on findings in our study, MSF might be a more favorable option for nondisplaced FNF, whereas cementless BHA might be a better one for displaced FNF in patients older than fifty. Nevertheless, our nationwide study also showed that numbers of cementless BHAs were being performed for nondisplaced FNF even in teaching hospitals. |
نوع الوثيقة: | article in journal/newspaper |
اللغة: | English |
تدمد: | 2045-2322 |
العلاقة: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01046-3Test; https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Test; https://doaj.org/article/e06589756cfc4c1a81561c3c1c2a1412Test |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-021-01046-3 |
الإتاحة: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01046-3Test https://doaj.org/article/e06589756cfc4c1a81561c3c1c2a1412Test |
رقم الانضمام: | edsbas.3830C36B |
قاعدة البيانات: | BASE |
تدمد: | 20452322 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-021-01046-3 |